Frances Maclennan vs Rauza Islanova Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
F. Maclennan vs R. Islanova

Frances Maclennan

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Rauza Islanova

URS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-To-Head: Maclennan 1 - 0 Islanova

They have played 3 sets in total, with Frances Maclennan winning 2 and Rauza Islanova winning 1. The last match between Frances Maclennan and Rauza Islanova was at the Wimbledon Plate, 26-06-1967, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Frances Maclennan getting the victory 6-1 5-7 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Maclennan	1
Islanova	0

Last H2H Matches:

(R3) Wimbledon Plate(06-26-67)

Stats

Frances Maclennan

Rauza Islanova

F. Maclennan vs R. Islanova H2H Profile

F. Maclennan	Stats	R. Islanova
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
44.07% (104-132)	Career Total W/L	25.64% (10-29)
1	Grass	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

F. Maclennan vs R. Islanova Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Frances Maclennan has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Rauza Islanova has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Frances Maclennan, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rauza Islanova has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Frances Maclennan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rauza Islanova has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Frances Maclennan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Rauza Islanova winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Frances Maclennan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 45/ 51), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4). Rauza Islanova has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
Player level: In the last year, Frances Maclennan has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Rauza Islanova has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Frances Maclennan winning 1 times and Rauza Islanova being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Frances Maclennan winning 2 and Rauza Islanova winning 1. The last match between Frances Maclennan and Rauza Islanova was at the Wimbledon Plate, 26-06-1967, Round: R3, Surface: Grass, with Frances Maclennan getting the victory 6-1 5-7 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Frances Maclennan has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Rauza Islanova has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Frances Maclennan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rauza Islanova has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Frances Maclennan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rauza Islanova has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Frances Maclennan vs Rauza Islanova Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

F. Maclennan vs R. Islanova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

F. Maclennan	Stats	R. Islanova
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
17	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

F. Maclennan Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 07-07-1975
R4 Lea PericoliL. Pericoli	L	6-2 9-7	Stats
Durham - 06-11-1973
R4 Julie HeldmanJ. Heldman	L	6-0 6-4	Stats
Edinburgh - 30-10-1973
R3 Sharon Walsh PeteS. Walsh	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Monmouthshire - 09-07-1973
R4 Sharon Walsh PeteS. Walsh	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 25-06-1973
Q1 Madeleine PegelM. Pegel	W	4-7 6-1 7-5	Stats

View All

R. Islanova Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Moscow - 18-02-1974
Olga MorozovaO. Morozova	L	7-5 7-6	Stats
Soviet Championships - 23-07-1973
F Marina KroschinaM. Kroschina	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Tallinn - 27-07-1972
R4 Zaiga YansoneZ. Yansone	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Moscow Indoors - 20-02-1972
R3 Eugenia BirioukovaE. Birioukova	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Moscow - 25-02-1971
R4 Miklashevskaya Miklashevskaya	W	6-2 6-0	Stats

View All

F. Maclennan vs R. Islanova Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

F. Maclennan	Stats	R. Islanova
44.07% (104/132)	YTD Win/Loss	25.64% (10/29)
45.54% (230/275)	Sets Win/Loss	33.72% (29/57)
48.09% (2130/2299)	Games Win/Loss	43.97% (361/460)
0.00% (0/4)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
46.88% (45/51)	Clay Win/Loss	12.50% (1/7)
48.57% (17/18)	Indoor Hard W/L	20.00% (3/12)
41.79% (28/39)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/4)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
7.73	Average Opponent Rank	5.31
47.62% (10/11)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/2)
34.62% (9/17)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
44% (101/228)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	27% (10/37)
43% (21/49)	Deciding Set Win %	25% (3/12)
85% (107/91)	1st Set Won, Won Match	64% (11/7)
15% (107/16)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	36% (11/4)
8% (121/10)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	12% (26/3)